Avoiding Common Mistakes in Placemaking Measurement

Placemaking, the art and science of creating spaces that resonate with communities, has become an integral part of urban development. As the significance of placemaking continues to grow, so does the need for accurate measurement tools to evaluate its success.

In this article, we delve into the four common mistakes that often hinder effective placemaking measurement. By steering clear of these pitfalls, placemakers can pave the way for more informed decisions.

1. Assumptions and Helicopter Approaches:
A prevalent blunder in placemaking measurement is the reliance on assumptions without sufficient data and evidence. Challenging assumptions and embracing data-driven insights allows placemakers to make informed decisions, fostering positive outcomes for communities.

2. Static Data Limitations:
Relying solely on static data poses another challenge, as it may not capture the dynamic nature of place performance over time. Placemakers should pivot towards real-time data, considering day-night dynamics, seasonal variations, and other temporal elements to gain a comprehensive understanding of place performance.

3. Choosing the Wrong Geography:
The misstep of using data aggregated to larger geographic areas, such as suburbs or postcodes, can distort the lived experience of a neighbourhood. Utilising hyper-local data sets ensures alignment with the unique characteristics and dynamics of a specific area, providing a more accurate representation of community life.

4. Expecting Unbiased Data:
An often-overlooked mistake is expecting data to be entirely unbiased. Placemakers must recognise and work with the inherent biases in data sets, using them as a foundation for well-informed decisions. While biased data may raise concerns, it can be strategically leveraged, as seen in the case of social media, where inherent biases offer valuable insights into community values.

Effective placemaking demands a paradigm shift. Embracing dynamic, hyper-local data, challenging assumptions, and understanding biases are crucial steps towards a data-driven and hyper-local future in placemaking. By steering clear of these common mistakes, placemakers can navigate the complexities of measurement, contributing to the continual improvement and vibrancy of our communities.

‍